The scalogram
A first example of affine distribution is given by the
scalogram (see section
3.4.2). Indeed, it is possible to
express it as a smoothed version of the WVD:
 |
|
|
(4.13) |
Thus, the scalogram corresponds to the distribution of the affine class for
which

. Expression (
4.13), to be compared
with expression (
4.7), shows that the scalogram is the affine
counterpart of the spectrogram. The scalogram validates properties 1. and
3. and is always positive.
To illustrate the importance of the smoothing operated by
on the
WVD of
, let us consider the case of a Morlet wavelet
. If we note
and
the respectively time and frequency widths of the
smoothing operated by the spectrogram of window
(
and
are constant values), these widths become variable with the
frequency in the case of the scalogram:
(

is the central frequency of the wavelet). This result, already made
out in the context of the wavelet transform analysis, is a characteristic
of any constant-Q analysis (see section
3.2.1): at a high frequency,
since the signal changes rapidly, a short analysis window is sufficient,
whereas at a low frequency, a large window is necessary to identify
correctly the pulsation of the signal which changes slowly. However, the
importance of the joint smoothing operated by the scalogram is still
equivalent to the one of the spectrogram:
Besides, the trade-off between time and frequency resolutions, following from
the Heisenberg-Gabor inequality and which applies to the spectrogram, is
also valid for the scalogram.
So as to see the effect of this frequency-dependent smoothing, we analyze
with the scalogram (Morlet wavelet) a signal composed of two gaussian
atoms, one with a low central frequency, and the other one with a high one
(see fig. 4.18):
>> sig=atoms(128,[38,0.1,32,1;96,0.35,32,1]);
>> tfrscalo(sig);
Figure 4.18:
Morlet scalogram of 2 atoms : the time- and
frequency- resolutions depend on the frequency (or scale)
 |
By default, the file
tfrscalo.m uses
an interactive mode in which you have to specify, from the plot of the
spectrum, the approximate lower and higher frequency bounds, as well as the
number of samples you wish in frequency (you should indicate here a lower
frequency lower than 0.05 and a higher frequency greater than 0.4). The
result obtained brings to the fore dependency, with regard to the
frequency, of the smoothing applied to the WVD, and consequently of the
resolutions in time and frequency.
Eric Chassande-Mottin
2005-10-26